Insurance Broker Evacuates Amid California Wildfires – Expert Insight
Published Date: 01/11/2025
When the Insurance Broker Becomes the Evacuee: Inside California’s Wildfire Coverage Crisis
As California continues to face one of its most destructive wildfire seasons in history, insurance experts are finding themselves on both sides of the crisis — advising clients by day and evacuating their own homes by night. One of them is Karl Sussman, a Los Angeles–based insurance broker who was recently forced to evacuate from the Pacific Palisades, one of the areas hardest hit by ongoing wildfires.
Sussman’s experience provides not only a personal glimpse into the chaos of evacuation but also a professional perspective on the rapidly evolving insurance landscape in California. As he and his family found safety amid the flames, the very system he works within was being tested by unprecedented losses, rising premiums, and changing state regulations.
A Broker in the Fireline: Personal and Professional Perspectives
When interviewed during the crisis, Sussman began not with market analysis, but with gratitude: his family was safe, together, and that was what truly mattered. “Everything else will find a way to work itself out,” he said. It was a human reminder that behind the staggering statistics of wildfire destruction are families — some of them professionals who understand the complexities of insurance better than anyone else.
But that human perspective quickly transitions to a professional reality check. Seven of California’s top twelve insurance companies have reduced or cut their coverage in the state over the last four years. For communities like the Palisades, which have long been considered at high fire risk, that retreat has left homeowners scrambling.
Sussman recalls that State Farm non-renewed roughly 1,626 homeowners’ policies in the Palisades area alone, making it one of the largest single-region withdrawals in recent memory. “Those people had to find coverage somewhere else,” he noted. “They either obtained coverage in the private sector — which was very challenging — or they went with the California FAIR Plan.”
The FAIR Plan, designed as an insurer of last resort, has become a lifeline for thousands of Californians. But it’s also a symptom of a deeper problem: the traditional insurance market no longer finds many parts of California insurable under existing models.
How Homeowners Are Being Forced to Adapt
For many Californians, obtaining fire coverage is no longer a matter of simply shopping around for quotes. It’s now a process of risk mitigation and compliance with increasingly strict insurer requirements.
Sussman described the new normal: “Most insurance companies will give guidelines — or mandates, really — that say, ‘If you want to keep your policy, you must make your home less likely to burn.’” This includes measures such as:
- Clearing brush and vegetation within a certain perimeter.
- Removing trees that hang over or touch roofs.
- Installing ember-resistant vents and fire-rated roofing.
- Maintaining defensible space around the property.
Failure to comply with these requirements can result in non-renewal. “People have had to get used to the idea of the insurance company dictating what changes they need to make to their property,” Sussman said. It’s a shift in the homeowner-insurer relationship — one where proactivity has replaced assumption as the key to maintaining coverage.
The Immediate Crisis: Evacuations and Limited Coverage
As Sussman spoke, the Palisades fire remained only 8% contained after three days. Normally, containment rises steadily after a few days, calming public anxiety. But this fire, fueled by relentless winds, defied expectations. Those same winds prevented firefighting aircraft from operating safely, making ground crews the only line of defense.
For many residents, the uncertainty of whether their homes would survive was compounded by another: Did they even have active coverage? Between policy lapses, non-renewals, and missed payments during chaotic evacuations, countless homeowners risked being uninsured right when they needed coverage most.
Recognizing this, California’s Insurance Commissioner took emergency action. The state ordered insurers to suspend all policy non-renewals in affected and surrounding areas. Additionally, insurers were required to reinstate lapsed policies if homeowners contacted them and paid any missed premiums. However, Sussman cautioned that this protection isn’t automatic — homeowners must take the initiative to reach out and confirm their policy status.
This 12-month cushion is intended to help residents stabilize and either restore coverage or secure new policies. But it also highlights how fragile the safety net can be, especially during disaster events.
Building from the Ground Up: What Insurance Does and Doesn’t Cover
In the aftermath of catastrophic fires, many residents discover that their insurance policies are not as comprehensive as they assumed. A standard homeowner’s policy, for instance, won’t cover rebuilding from the ground up if the entire structure is lost. That requires a specialized policy — something many homeowners learn too late.
As Sussman points out, “A homeowner’s policy will not cover you if you’re building from the ground up. You need to get a special policy for that.” Given the magnitude of destruction in some communities, thousands of Californians will now be facing that exact situation.
Federal Support: Biden’s 100% Coverage Pledge
Amid the chaos, President Joe Biden pledged 100% federal coverage of the fire response — a major commitment designed to relieve California’s strained resources. For Sussman, this federal assistance is a welcome relief. “It’s always good to have the resources of the feds coming in when we need them,” he said. “It frees up money in California for us to do other things to assist people.”
While the financial aid won’t directly resolve the state’s insurance crisis, it can help offset some costs for emergency response, cleanup, and rebuilding — all of which indirectly support the insurance ecosystem by reducing claims pressure and speeding up recovery.
A System Under Reinvention: California’s Sustainable Insurance Strategy
Even before the fires reached their peak, California regulators had already begun implementing new rules to address long-term instability in the market. In late 2024, the Sustainable Insurance Strategy was signed into law, requiring private insurers to offer coverage statewide — including in high-risk wildfire zones.
The intent is to rebalance access to coverage by preventing companies from abandoning entire regions. In theory, this ensures that Californians, regardless of zip code, can still obtain fire insurance from private carriers instead of relying solely on the FAIR Plan.
Sussman sees this as a necessary evolution, but not without consequences. “We’re going to see rates going up in the areas that are at higher risk,” he explained. “And rates coming down in areas that are not as likely to burn.”
This reflects a new era of risk-based pricing, where premiums are expected to align more closely with local fire exposure data. While that may improve insurer sustainability, it also means that affordability challenges will persist for residents of high-risk regions.
The Broader Implications: Lessons from the Frontlines
The story of Karl Sussman — both as an evacuee and as an insurance expert — underscores a central truth about California’s wildfire crisis: no one is immune, and the system itself must adapt.
Several takeaways emerge:
- Insurance availability is no longer guaranteed, even for long-time policyholders.
- Homeowners must become active risk managers, investing in fire prevention and mitigation.
- Government and private sectors must collaborate to sustain coverage options and affordability.
- Climate change is not a future problem — it’s a present disruptor reshaping financial systems, communities, and expectations.
As Sussman notes, the Sustainable Insurance Strategy may prevent a complete collapse in coverage availability, but it won’t reverse the trend of rising premiums. The underlying challenge remains: balancing risk, affordability, and accessibility in a landscape defined by natural volatility.
Conclusion: Hope in the Ashes
California’s wildfire crisis is testing the limits of both its natural resilience and its insurance framework. For professionals like Karl Sussman, the battle is personal and professional — a test of endurance, adaptation, and leadership.
As the flames eventually die down, the rebuilding will begin not just with lumber and concrete, but with a renewed approach to how we insure, regulate, and live with risk. The lesson is clear: fire prevention and insurance reform are no longer separate issues — they are two sides of the same coin.
California’s story, then, becomes not just about what burned, but about what can be rebuilt — smarter, safer, and more sustainable than before.
Author