Karl's Final Thoughts on New Car-Sharing Insurance Legislation Discussion with Blanca Pacheco
Published Date: 08/04/2024
Karl’s Final Thoughts: Why Car-Sharing Insurance Legislation Matters — Understanding AB 2743 and the Power of Consumer Choice
Insurance isn’t glamorous. It’s not the kind of topic that sparks viral conversations at coffee shops or fills social media feeds with excitement. But for millions of Californians, it quietly determines whether families recover after accidents, whether businesses survive economic uncertainty, and whether innovation can thrive in an increasingly complex marketplace.
In the closing segment of Insurance Hour, host Karl Susman reflected on his recent conversation with Assemblymember Blanca Pacheco (D–Downey) about Assembly Bill 2743 (AB 2743) — the car-sharing insurance bill that has captured attention throughout the state.
While the earlier episodes explored the legislative and political aspects of AB 2743, this final discussion offered something deeper: a broker’s perspective on why insurance limits, liability choices, and consumer freedom matter more than ever.
The Core Issue: Liability Limits and Legislative Change
At its heart, AB 2743 addresses a technical but critical issue — insurance liability limits for peer-to-peer car-sharing platforms such as Turo and Getaround.
These companies allow individuals to rent out their personal vehicles to others, creating a “shared economy” model that benefits car owners, renters, and local communities. But new regulations set to take effect in January 2025 would drastically increase the minimum required insurance limits for these platforms — potentially driving them out of California altogether.
Susman summarized it succinctly:
“We had the pleasure of speaking with Assemblywoman Blanca Pacheco… about a bill that’s going to potentially impact insurance limits on car sharing. I can’t stop wanting to say ride sharing because I’ve heard it so much. But this is car sharing.”
That distinction — between ride-sharing (like Uber) and car-sharing (like Turo) — is essential. Ride-sharing involves paying someone to drive you. Car-sharing, on the other hand, means renting someone’s personal vehicle and driving it yourself. And under current California law, these models are treated very differently when it comes to insurance requirements.
Why Liability Insurance Matters
Susman used his airtime to educate listeners about a concept that sits at the foundation of all insurance: liability coverage.
“When you have an insurance policy, you’re making a choice,” he explained. “You decide how much liability insurance you want to have — how much protection you want between yourself, your assets, and the other party that might come after you in the event of some type of negligence.”
Liability insurance is, in essence, a financial buffer — protection from the costs of being sued if you cause injury or property damage.
“It’s a buffer,” Susman said. “How much distance do you want to put between your bank account and whatever might be coming after you?”
This “buffer” concept helps simplify what can be an abstract financial decision. Consumers choose limits — for example, $100,000, $300,000, or $1 million — based on how much protection they want and can afford.
“Some people will say they just want whatever the law requires,” Susman continued. “It could be $15,000, $30,000 — it varies by state. And in California, that minimum limit is changing.”
California’s Changing Insurance Landscape
Indeed, California’s financial responsibility laws are in flux. The state is phasing in new minimum liability requirements beginning January 2025, with increases planned through 2026 and 2027.
While higher minimums can help ensure that injured parties are adequately compensated, they also raise costs for insurers and consumers.
For car-sharing businesses, those increases could be devastating. AB 2743 seeks to prevent those unintended consequences by keeping coverage requirements for car-sharing platforms stable and realistic.
“This particular bill has to do with the limit being required for a business that’s doing business in California,” Susman explained. “What this legislation does is provide businesses with a lower threshold — a lower pay-to-play form of entry.”
In simpler terms: AB 2743 doesn’t eliminate insurance requirements. It preserves them at a fair level — balancing consumer protection with market sustainability.
Understanding Financial Responsibility — and Choice
One of Susman’s most insightful moments came when he discussed the concept of financial responsibility — the legal obligation drivers have to cover damages they may cause.
Most people meet this obligation by purchasing insurance. But, as Susman reminded listeners, that’s not the only option.
“You don’t actually have to have an insurance policy,” he said. “You could post a bond and still satisfy that requirement.”
This little-known fact underscores a larger truth: insurance is about options. Consumers must be empowered to choose the level and method of protection that makes sense for them — not forced into one-size-fits-all mandates.
“Choice is everything,” Susman emphasized. “Consumers need to be able to make the choices for themselves, and businesses can make the choices for themselves as well.”
That philosophy is woven throughout AB 2743. The bill doesn’t remove coverage — it restores choice by ensuring that companies aren’t burdened with excessive, arbitrary limits that don’t reflect actual risk.
A Broker’s Perspective: Balancing Risk and Reality
Drawing on his decades of industry experience, Susman broke down why higher liability limits, while well-intentioned, can backfire if imposed without context.
“Insurance companies are in the business of providing what consumers are looking to purchase,” he said. “You can buy liability insurance in the thousands, the tens of thousands, the hundreds of thousands — even the millions or tens of millions.”
But the key question is: how much is enough?
“Does the average person need $100 million in coverage? Of course not,” he noted. “Do they need $15,000? $100,000? $500,000? A million? That’s where it becomes individualized — and why choice is so important.”
That choice is not only about affordability but also about financial planning. Someone with substantial assets might need higher limits to protect their wealth, while others might prioritize affordability to maintain coverage at all.
“Some people will say they only need as much coverage as they have assets,” Susman explained. “But that misses the point — you may have fewer assets, but that doesn’t mean you can’t be sued for more than you own.”
In other words, insurance isn’t just about covering what you have — it’s about protecting your future financial stability.
Why AB 2743 Reflects Sound Insurance Principles
From a policy standpoint, AB 2743 embodies the same principle that underlies smart insurance decisions: reasonable protection without overreach.
The bill maintains strong coverage standards for car-sharing programs but prevents a disproportionate jump that could cripple the market.
“It provides businesses with a lower threshold — a more reasonable entry point,” Susman said. “That keeps innovation alive and allows consumers to keep making their own decisions.”
In doing so, AB 2743 aligns with the core goal of insurance itself: to spread risk efficiently while keeping participation accessible.
Without such balance, both businesses and individuals face exclusion — not from lack of desire to comply, but from inability to afford the compliance.
A Real-World Example: The Cost of Small Claims
Susman illustrated how even small incidents can become costly, reinforcing why liability protection — and sensible regulation — are so important.
“For small fender benders, even when nobody’s hurt and the damage is minor, costs add up quickly,” he said. “If attorneys get involved, it gets more expensive and more time passes.”
In such cases, higher mandated insurance limits don’t necessarily lead to better outcomes — they can simply inflate costs system-wide, raising premiums for everyone.
That’s why, he argued, lawmakers should be cautious when adjusting limits, ensuring changes are data-driven, not symbolic.
Consumer Education: The Missing Ingredient
Beyond legislation, Susman’s reflections pointed to a bigger challenge in the insurance world: consumer awareness.
“Insurance isn’t the most exciting thing in the world,” he admitted. “But it’s important that you understand what you’re getting, what you should be looking for, and what the red flags are.”
He encouraged listeners to stay informed, ask questions, and engage with professionals who can help them navigate increasingly complex coverage options.
“Things are more complicated than they used to be,” he said. “You just need to know more than you used to.”
This educational mission — blending policy insight with practical advice — has long been the hallmark of Insurance Hour.
Why This Bill Matters Beyond Car Sharing
While AB 2743 focuses on car-sharing insurance, its implications extend far beyond that niche. The bill represents a test case for how California handles innovation — whether the state supports new business models with adaptive legislation or drives them away with outdated mandates.
“This legislation provides businesses with a fairer path to operate,” Susman said. “And when businesses can stay in California, consumers win too.”
It’s a reminder that insurance regulation doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It shapes everything from economic development to environmental sustainability (since car-sharing reduces emissions by maximizing vehicle use).
Final Thoughts: The Freedom to Choose
As Susman wrapped up his final thoughts, one theme came through loud and clear: the freedom to choose is fundamental — for consumers, for businesses, and for the health of the insurance system itself.
“Choice is everything,” he said again, closing the episode. “Consumers need to be able to make their own decisions, and businesses need to have reasonable ways to participate.”
That balance — between regulation and freedom, between safety and innovation — is what keeps California’s economy resilient.
Susman’s message was simple but powerful: the more informed people are about insurance, the more empowered they become to protect themselves, their families, and their communities.
“Thank you so much for being here and learning with us today,” he concluded. “Insurance may not be sexy, but it’s essential.”
Key Takeaways
- AB 2743 protects California’s peer-to-peer car-sharing industry by stabilizing insurance requirements.
- Liability insurance acts as a buffer — protecting individuals and businesses from financial loss due to negligence.
- Consumer choice is the cornerstone of effective insurance markets.
- Financial responsibility laws can be satisfied through insurance or bonds — highlighting the importance of flexibility.
- The bill reflects a broader principle: balanced regulation encourages innovation while maintaining protection for all.
Author