Understanding the California FAIR Plan: How It’s Navigating the LA Wildfires and What Homeowners Need to Know
Published Date: 01/24/2025
California’s insurance market is once again at a crossroads. Following the devastating Los Angeles County wildfires, thousands of homeowners—many already forced out of traditional insurance markets—are depending on the California FAIR Plan to rebuild. But with estimated payouts approaching $6 billion, experts warn that the state’s last-resort fire insurer is facing a financial and operational stress test unlike any in its history.
On ABC 10 News, reporter Jane Kim spoke with insurance expert Karl Susman, host of Insurance Hour, who explained both the risks and the resilience of this vital but strained safety net. His insights shed light on how the FAIR Plan operates, why it remains solvent despite record losses, and what its future may mean for millions of Californians caught in the middle of the insurance crisis.
1. A Market on the Brink: Why Californians Are Turning to the FAIR Plan
The FAIR Plan—short for Fair Access to Insurance Requirements—was never intended to be a permanent insurance solution. Created by the California Legislature in 1968, it was designed as a temporary stopgap for homeowners unable to obtain coverage through private insurers, especially in high-risk wildfire areas.
But today, that “temporary” plan has become a lifeline for hundreds of thousands of homeowners across the state.
As major carriers like State Farm, Allstate, and Farmers restrict new policies or exit high-risk regions altogether, homeowners in places like Alpine, Napa, and the foothills have few options left.
One homeowner interviewed by ABC 10, Paul Felber, described the uncertainty vividly:
“If I was a new buyer, I’d be hesitant to even buy because I wouldn’t know whether I could maintain my mortgage over the next five or ten years.”
For many like Felber, the FAIR Plan isn’t just a choice—it’s the only way to meet mortgage requirements and maintain financial stability.
2. The $6 Billion Question: Can the FAIR Plan Survive the LA Fires?
The latest Los Angeles County fires are projected to cost the FAIR Plan nearly $6 billion in claims, primarily for properties in the Pacific Palisades and surrounding areas. That staggering figure raises an obvious question: Can the FAIR Plan afford it?
According to Karl Susman, the answer is yes—but not without strain.
“For all of the heartache that the FAIR Plan is going through—and their books being out of balance—we’re seeing that they are paying their claims,” Susman explained. “They’re doing what they were designed to do. It just might not be as fast as we’d see from a private insurance company, but they’re getting there.”
The FAIR Plan is not taxpayer-funded. Instead, it’s supported by all admitted insurance companies licensed to operate in California. Each participating insurer contributes to the FAIR Plan’s pool based on its market share. If the Plan runs short on funds, it can issue bonds or assess those insurers to cover claims.
In extreme cases—like after these LA fires—insurance companies may seek permission from the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to recoup a portion of those assessments through premium surcharges. That means even customers insured by traditional carriers could feel a ripple effect in their rates over the next few years.
3. How a FAIR Plan “Bailout” Actually Works
When ABC 10’s Jane Kim mentioned a potential “bailout,” it raised alarms among homeowners. But in this case, a bailout doesn’t mean insolvency or collapse—it means a temporary liquidity solution.
The FAIR Plan operates under a carefully regulated financial structure:
- It maintains cash reserves for claim payouts.
- It purchases reinsurance—insurance for insurers—to offset catastrophic losses.
- When reserves and reinsurance are exhausted, it can issue bonds or assess member insurers.
These mechanisms ensure policyholders remain protected, even in large-scale disasters. However, they also mean that payouts may take longer, especially when administrative or financing steps are involved.
Susman reassured viewers that despite the pressure, homeowners’ coverage remains intact:
“People will still have coverage, even with a bailout—it just might take some time to pay off their claims.”
In other words, the FAIR Plan may bend, but it won’t break.
4. Why FAIR Plan Policies Are So Expensive—Yet Still Limited
Ironically, despite being a last-resort program, the FAIR Plan often costs more than traditional homeowners insurance.
A typical FAIR Plan policy covers only fire, lightning, and internal explosion—leaving out critical protections like water damage, theft, or liability. Homeowners must purchase a “Difference in Conditions” (DIC) policy separately to fill those gaps, effectively doubling their total premium.
Susman and other experts note that a combined FAIR + DIC package can easily exceed $10,000–$15,000 per year, particularly in wildfire-prone regions like Malibu, Napa, and San Bernardino County.
Still, for many, the FAIR Plan remains the only option. Without it, lenders can impose force-placed insurance, a minimal and expensive policy that protects the bank’s interest but not the homeowner’s.
5. The Human Element: Homeowners Taking Matters Into Their Own Hands
While the FAIR Plan provides financial protection, homeowners like Paul Felber are taking practical steps to minimize their fire risk—and, potentially, their premiums.
“You’re going to have to use every technique you can to protect the house from fire,” Felber said. “If that means the house is going to be more expensive, that’s okay. That’s just the way it has to be.”
From replacing windows and sealing attics to installing fire-resistant roofing and defensible landscaping, these mitigation efforts are becoming not just best practices but necessities.
Karl Susman emphasized that such actions not only improve personal safety but may also qualify homeowners for discounts or better rates—especially as insurers and regulators push for more risk-based pricing models.
6. The FAIR Plan’s Role in the Broader Crisis
The FAIR Plan’s rising prominence highlights deeper structural problems within California’s insurance market.
Once a small safety net, it now covers over 350,000 homes, a number that’s tripled in just five years. Each new catastrophe—from the Camp Fire to the current LA inferno—adds more policyholders while deterring private insurers from returning to the market.
This feedback loop creates a paradox: the more successful the FAIR Plan becomes, the more it signals market failure elsewhere.
Policymakers are currently exploring reforms aimed at stabilizing this imbalance. Proposals include:
- Allowing faster rate approvals for insurers to reflect real risk.
- Encouraging mitigation-based incentives for homeowners.
- Expanding public-private reinsurance partnerships to share catastrophic risk.
Without systemic change, California’s insurance market could become a two-tier system—with the FAIR Plan as a default for high-risk homeowners and private coverage available only to those in safer areas.
7. What Homeowners Should Do Now
For those currently on the FAIR Plan—or considering it—Susman offered several key recommendations:
- Maintain your coverage, even if it’s costly. It’s easier to adjust or switch policies later than to find new coverage from scratch.
- Add a DIC (Difference in Conditions) policy. This supplements the FAIR Plan’s limited protections by covering liability, water damage, and theft.
- Document your mitigation efforts. Keep receipts, photos, and certifications for fireproofing or home-hardening measures.
- Stay in touch with your agent. Renewal terms and rate changes happen fast—early communication can save time and money.
- Support legislative reform. Consumer voices matter in shaping a sustainable insurance future for California.
8. The Path Forward: From Reaction to Resilience
California’s FAIR Plan is more than just a policy—it’s a reflection of how the state manages collective risk in the face of worsening natural disasters. While it’s currently under immense strain, it continues to serve its purpose: providing coverage when no one else will.
As Susman noted, its ability to pay claims, even under pressure, should reassure homeowners that insurance—though imperfect—still works.
The long-term solution, however, lies not in expanding emergency measures but in rebuilding a viable private market, one that rewards risk reduction, embraces transparency, and keeps insurance accessible to all Californians.
“The FAIR Plan is doing what it was designed to do,” Susman said. “But it was never meant to be forever.”
Conclusion: The FAIR Plan’s Future Depends on Policy, Not Panic
California’s FAIR Plan stands at a crossroads—caught between its mission to serve and the financial realities of an increasingly volatile climate. Its survival isn’t in doubt, but its sustainability is.
If the LA fires have proven anything, it’s that the FAIR Plan remains both a safety net and a warning sign. It’s proof of the system’s resilience—and evidence of how urgently reform is needed.
For now, homeowners can take comfort in knowing that, even amid billions in losses, the FAIR Plan is still paying claims, protecting homes, and buying time for California’s leaders to act.
Author
